Facebook 
Twitter 
Soundcloud 
Youtube 
Rss 
Oxford University’s Matthew Walton tempers excitement about political change in Myanmar under Aung San Suu Kyi’s NLD, reports Amy Doffegnies.
While Myanmar’s entry into an era of NLD-led government in 2016 was a cause for immense hope, Oxford University’s Dr Matthew Walton paints a more sobering scene — pointing to major issues that continue to plague the country.
Dr Walton was speaking about key political developments in the country at the 2017 Myanmar Update, hosted by the Australian National University on 17-18 February.
As Dr Walton highlighted, the situation on the ground has deteriorated for many Myanmar people as war continues in Kachin and Shan states. Worsening the crisis of 98, 000 internally displaced people in these states alone is the fact that this “human suffering gets ignored” Walton said. Describing the on-going Peace Process as “elite driven” and insufficiently inclusive, little optimism was expressed for March’s Panglong Conference.
The events of October 2016 in Rakhine state — attacks on Myanmar border police by alleged Islamic militants — and the heavy-handed military retaliation on entire Rohingya communities are also extremely concerning. As a result of this collective retribution by the Myanmar army, tens upon tens of thousands have fled the country, prompting criticism from Myanmar’s ASEAN neighbours and beyond. Dr Walton pressed the need for scholars and journalists to continue to call upon the government for restraint and the unrestricted flow of aid to affected communities in dire need.
Meanwhile, the broader problem of anti-Muslim sentiment and hate speech, as well as everyday discrimination suffered by religious minorities has received limited attention from the NLD government, Dr Walton stressed.
Conversely, Dr Walton pointed to progress in the growing strength of community activism in Myanmar, with land disputes being the issue animating the most action. The wealth of energy among community organisations was set in contrast with MPs in power, whose chances for lively debate in parliament have been hindered by centralised party leadership. If progress is to be made and Myanmar’s multiple issues addressed, NLD governance must move beyond a “one woman show” said Dr Walton.
In order to move forward in consolidating the country’s transition to democracy, Dr Walton concluded by calling for the NLD government to “embrace the power and skill of all of its citizens who have been waiting for this opportunity for decades and are ready to start.”
During the conference’s political update session, Professor Maung Aung Myoe of the International University of Japan shed light on the all-important topic of relations and power sharing between the NLD government and the military.
Despite the party’s strong mandate and legitimacy, it was argued that a cautious NLD has instigated little major change in the country’s political structure “with no visible signs of transforming civil-military relations”.
Since the NLD took office in February 2016, the military’s intention to retain their influence, especially in national security matters was clear. This was signalled in the military’s release of their first Defence White Paper the same month the elected government entered parliament, Maung Aung Myoe noted.
While there is friction between the two sides, overall the military has a reasonable working relationship with the NLD government, Maung Aung Myoe noted, “with the NLD quite willing to work with the military.”
In dealing with the crucial issue of the Peace Process, it was noted that there has been “little change in form and substance of the negotiation process.” In this regard, the NLD seem to be following in the footsteps of the previous government, “taking the Tatmadaw’s position as its own policy”.
The NLD has made some moves to minimise the military’s involvement in the policy process, observed Maung Aung Myoe. However, the session concluded on the note that the influence of the military, evident in its’ shaping of foreign relations and the Peace Process, seems set to remain entrenched.
Amy Doffegnies is a PhD scholar at UNSW Canberra researching the relationship between Buddhism and human rights in Myanmar. She also has strong interests in issues of freedom of expression, censorship and writers in Myanmar.
Listen to the political update from the 2017 Myanmar Update here or in the player above.
The next Panglong conference is now expected to take place in early May.
1
1
A one sided announcement to boot.
https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/despite-state-counselors-announcement-unfc-members-undecided-on-nca-signing.html
0
0
Aung San Suu Kyi and her top down leadership (of the NLD party), has been a huge disappointment for the millions of Burmese who are still mired in extreme poverty, illiteracy, suppression by the military generals who still run the show and call the shots behind the scenes.
I’m appalled, as is the world, of the ethnic cleansing that has taken place in Rakhine State, despite repeated denials and silence on her part from confronting and speaking out against what has transpired. Myanmar being a devout Buddhist country, yet the atrocities done to the Rohingya people in Rakhine by the military has been shocking, despite their attempts to cover up the pillaging, rape, murder and burning of whole villages. Not to mention the radical and hardline Buddhists, led by Wirathu, who has relentlessly spearheaded the anti-muslim movement, to drive the millions of muslims out of Myanmar.
She reminds me of the “Stockholm” syndrome and it’s becoming evident that she was and is power hungry and not who she projected to be. History is replete w/examples that when you put someone on a pedestal, they are bound to disappoint and fall, since they too have flaws, weaknesses and shortcomings.
Ms Suu Kyi’s perceived silence on the Rohingya has severely damaged her reputation as a beacon for human rights. In hindsight, the Nobel Committee should have waited before deciding to award her the prize. This former beacon of the human rights community is now very much alienated from many of her international supporters. She is wary of the media and disdainful of her international critics, far more the steely politician than the global icon feted from capital to capital when she was released seven years ago.
The military generals have used her to get most if not all sanctions lifted and despite aid and investments that have poured in since she took office, the military continues to have full control and benefit economically in every way imaginable while the majority of the Burmese continue to suffer day by day.
The majority of Burmese people are beginning to realize that she’s not the “savior” they thought she would be. It was only a matter of time before their eyes were opened and now it has.
2
6