Menu
close

Comments

  1. Ron Torrence says:
    19 December 2011 at 11:48 am
    Thailand’s high calibre Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    the scary thing is, that there are actually a few people who actually think like this and assume most Thais are alike in these thoughts, and that they speak for all Thai people.

  2. Greg Lopez says:
    19 December 2011 at 11:23 am
    Why Singapore government become like that?

    Rising discontent in Singapore.

  3. Greg Lopez says:
    19 December 2011 at 10:58 am
    Why Singapore government become like that?

    “…Margaret Heffernan, author of Wilful Blindness: Why We Ignore The Obvious At Our Peril, argues that large organizations have the tendency choose people like themselves, thus becoming victims of group think, to become deferent to authority, and become highly conformist even if decisions or conclusions reached are obviously wrong….”

    I can say that this is absolutely spot on when it comes to Malaysia’s political leaders and government agencies.

    Damn, Malaysia (UMNO) and Singapore (PAP) the same.

    How can like that?

  4. Vichai N says:
    19 December 2011 at 10:57 am
    Why Singapore government become like that?

    The Singapore government incompetent ?? while old LKY still lives and his son rules? Why Ah Beng, that’s errr . . . what’s the Christian word . . . blasphemy?

    Ah Beng says ‘growing incompetency’. ‘Growing incompetency’ term commonly applies only to less-developed governments like Thailand, Philippines and neighbor Malaysia . . . because corruption feeds the incompetency, and growing corruption feeds growing incompetency.

    If Ah Beng could cite me that in Singapore corruption in government has indeed surfaced palpably, then I could begin to give credence to Ah Beng’s claim that incompetency may indeed creeping in (with a vengeance?) at Singapore.

  5. Billy Budd says:
    19 December 2011 at 10:50 am
    Thailand’s high calibre Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    Anouvong, 3
    Rather cleverly, it’s both. And therefore doubly satirical ๐Ÿ˜‰

  6. Donatella Toddawally says:
    19 December 2011 at 9:23 am
    Another academic victim of 112

    Vaclav Havel died and I read an in memoriam that quotes from his 1978 essay, “The Power of the Powerless”. It reminds me of the cold dead hand that seems to linger over Thailand these days:

    “The manager of a fruit-and-vegetable shop places in his window, among the onions and carrots, the slogan: “Workers of the world, unite!” Why does he do it? What is he trying to communicate to the world? Is he genuinely enthusiastic about the idea of unity among the workers of the world? Is his enthusiasm so great that he feels an irrepressible impulse to acquaint the public with his ideals? Has he really given more than a moment’s thought to how such a unification might occur and what it would mean? ”

    Follow the link to read it the rest:
    http://history.hanover.edu/courses/excerpts/165havel.html

  7. Jim Taylor says:
    19 December 2011 at 9:18 am
    Another academic victim of 112

    well if PTP and/or Thaksin/ were that powerful as Patrick# 27 suggests governing according to electoral mandate would be simple…(and Thaksin right now back in Thailand). Patrick notes: “Right now the monarchy is a hostage to Thaksin” (?) Blimey. Thaksin would love to hear that. He may be rich, but he is homeless. As for Crispin– I would not bank on the reliability of this information –or his reactionary yellow media outlet [always keen to sow the seeds of intrigue]. PTP in fact have to measure each move and there are lots of inside moves we just dont know about. It is not that simple –as Nick#29 also suggests. Having a gun pointed at one’s head (in the case of PTP) is not fun and does not allow much room for creativity; then ultimately Yingluck has to be responsible for outcomes and at the same time brave enough to take the consequences (e.g. as in immediately rectifying the Rome Treaty).
    I agree with Nick in this instance, watch the coming weeks: far-right/ reactionaries on the street again; coopted civil society working their damn best to undermine any sense of [red shirt] pro-democratic sentiments and unity, or GOVT integrity, etc. as happened when they were obstructed and misinformed in relation to the flooding. We are goin back to the mess leading up the 2006 coup– next move is to roll out the anti-citizen high level judges to “fix the problem” for the amaat…

  8. Anouvong says:
    19 December 2011 at 7:10 am
    Thailand’s high calibre Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    Somchai – 1

    I cannot tell if that is satire or real. That’s the frightening part.

  9. Lleij Samuel Schwartz says:
    19 December 2011 at 7:06 am
    Refining the misconception of apostasy in Islam

    @ Neptunian

    Unfortunately, it is not as simple as you state. Within the Qu’ran, several passages seems to contradict each other. To address this, Muhammad developed the doctrine of abrogation, i.e. verse that were written in Mecca are canceled out by verses written in Medina.

    The Medinan verses have this to say about apostasy:

    The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is : execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land : that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter ; Sura 5:33

    But those who reject Faith after they accepted it, and then go on adding to their defiance of Faith,- never will their repentance be accepted ; for they are those who have (of set purpose) gone astray. Sura 3:90

    Any one who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief,- except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith – but such as open their breast to Unbelief, on them is Wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a dreadful Penalty. Sura 16:106

    Those who believe, then reject faith, then believe (again) and (again) reject faith, and go on increasing in unbelief,- Allah will not forgive them nor guide them nor guide them on the way. Sura 4:137

    This view is further reinforced in the Hadith:

    Narrated Ikrima: Some Zanakiqa (atheists) were brought to Ali; and he burnt them. The news of this event reached Ibn Abbas who said, “If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah’s Messenger forbade it, saying, ‘Do not punish anybody with Allah’s punishment (fire).’ I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah’s Messenger: ‘Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.'” al-Bukhari 6922

    Abu Qilaba al-Jarmi related that Anas said, “A group from ‘Ukl came to the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, and became Muslim. They disliked Madina and the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, ordered them to go out to the zakat camels and drink their milk and urine. They did that and then regained their health. Then they apostatised and killed the herdsman and stole the camels. The Prophet sent [some people] in pursuit of them and they were brought and their hands and feet were cut off and their eyes gouged out and then they were not cauterised until they died.” al-Bukhari 6417

    Abd-Allah ibn Masood said : The Messenger of Allah said : โ€œIt is not permissible to shed the blood of a Muslim who bears witness that there is no god except Allah and that I am the Messenger of Allah, except in one of three cases : a soul (in case of murder) ; a married person who commits adultery ; and one who leaves his religion and separates from the main body of Muslims.โ€ Al Bukhari number 6484 and Sahih Muslim number 1676

    etc.

    That having been established, the question is who is eligible to determine whether someone has apostatized or not (called Takfir in Islam). The general view is that only a recognized Islamic scholar has the ability to practice Takfir; however, a growing movement known as the Takfiri argue that a Muslim can declare Takfir themselves, and is thus free to indulge in the violent punishments proscribed in the Medinan verses. The followers of Sayyid Qutb, a founding member of the Muslim Brotherhood (of whom Anwar Ibrahim is an well-known member), often argue from a Takfiri viewpoint.

    It is worth noting that the author of this post, Dr. Zulkifi Hasan received two of his degrees and is currently faculty at the Islamic Science University of Malaysia, one of four Islamic Science centers established by Dr. Muhammad Abdul Rauf, another early founding member of the Muslim Brotherhood and radical Takfiri. That Dr. Zulkifi fails to mention the doctrine of Medinan abrogation, nor discuss the influnce of the Takfiri on the current Islamic viewpoint on apostasy leads me to believe that people like him are some of the biggest obstacles in the “honest scholarly-led debate based on facts, textual injunctions analyses and focused on the real issues rather than blindly beating around the bush.”

  10. The Chinese of Vientiane, Laos โ”ฌโ•— Old World Wandering: A Travelogue says:
    19 December 2011 at 1:28 am
    China – the largest foreign investor in Laos

    […] Only, Laos was not happily stagnant. The countryโ€™s single-party government wanted Laos off the list of least developed countries by 2020 and foreign investment โ€“ in mining, transport, hydropower and, to a lesser extent, agriculture and services โ€“ was how it planned to get there. The plan was working too: Laosโ€™ economy, which neither grew nor shrunk substantially in the eighties and nineties, quadrupled in size between 2002 and 2010. Its traditional investors were Thai and Vietnamese, but last year, by investing $344 million over the course of just six months, Chinese companies had overtaken them both. […]

  11. Joshua Woo says:
    19 December 2011 at 1:10 am
    Refining the misconception of apostasy in Islam

    I re-read this interesting article and find that Zulkifli Hasan needs to clarify what he meant by the following confusing statement in the ‘Concluding remarks’:

    “The preceding discussion concludes that Islam has a strong and solid theoretical and epistemological foundation for apostasy.”

    Is Zulklifi saying that his article has built a strong case for Muslims to apostatize from Islam should they choose to?

    If this is the case, then it outright contradicts what he has written under the section “Freedom of religion is not absolute”:

    “…in order to protect the sanctity of this religion, Islam has laid down specific sanction on the matter of apostasy.”

    Look forward to read his clarification.

  12. Ed says:
    19 December 2011 at 12:51 am
    Why Singapore government become like that?

    Singapore is controlled by one family right? Even the PM’s wife is CEO of that big government link company right?

  13. Jahrzehntelange Haft: In Thailand verstโ”œโ•ขโ”œะฏt Amnesty International gegen die eigenen Grundsโ”œะดtze « Der Gleichklang-Polit-Blog says:
    19 December 2011 at 12:38 am
    Amnesty’s silence on lese majeste

    […] gegen den ั‚ะะฎMissbrauchโ€œ dieser Gesetze zur Ausschaltung anderer politischer Gegner wandte (siehe hier). In den Jahresberichten von 2007-2010 findet sich lediglich die Erwโ”œะดhnung einer โ”œะดuโ”œะฏerst […]

  14. Siti Kasim says:
    19 December 2011 at 12:07 am
    Refining the misconception of apostasy in Islam

    Dear Neptunian,

    I wish it is that simple. The problem is the mainstream views and interpretation on Islam is far from palatable and it is practiced in all of the Muslim countries save for Turkey, for now. I have always said to Muslim apologists that a religion cannot speak for itself and it is spoken only through the behaviour and the rituals of its followers. I have yet to see the views and interpretation by these Muslim apologists to materialise.

    This aspect of Islam portrays one of its most ugly sides – i.e. the murder of those who think for themselves. Look today at the Islamic world, we see it backwards, regressive, and primitive. The poor people who have grown up into Islam, who have had to adopt this dark system, are kept in bondage. It is no wonder that their countries continue to regress since freedom of thought, freedom of creativity, freedom of expression is stifled. We see the Muslim states falling further behind the rest of the world in areas like education, science, and the arts. The more Islamic a state becomes, the farther it regresses.

    If what you are saying is true, show it to me, where in the world that practices such an interpretation?

    Siti

  15. Adam says:
    18 December 2011 at 11:58 pm
    Refining the misconception of apostasy in Islam

    Thank you for taking the time and effort in writing the article which could be summarised as follows:-

    – Apostasy was an offense according to other religions such as Christianity and Judaism. Question: is it still considered an offense now?

    – Islam guarantees the “unconditional” freedom to choose any religion. This is acceptable but…

    – Freedom from religion is not absolute once one becomes a Muslim. In other words, a person who believes in any religion other than Islam has absolute and unconditional freedom to opt in or opt out of any religion but a Muslim has no absolute freedom to opt out? How could this be right and sensible?

    Your reason that Islam considers it an offense holds no water. It is like you wanting to migrate to another country but you present country considers this as an insult and would not let you go and even imprison you. How do you like that? Your wife wants to divorce you but you consider it as an insult to your manhood and you would not let her go and even punish her. Would you do that?

    Religion may be about the divine but no God worth believing would impose such a condition. Just as no loving parents would punish their children who want to leave the family. They could only persuade them to stay and if they still insist, would provide support and ensure their safety.

    Please reconsider your stance.

  16. Frank G Anderson says:
    18 December 2011 at 11:03 pm
    Another academic victim of 112

    I draft translated this a couple of years back, and it needs some checking, but I throw it out in case it did not appear on past pages. It is the standard procedure police cite internally to use in LM investigations.
    FGA

    From: http://www.sobsuan.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=1879&highlight=
    Unofficial D R A F T Translation by FGA
    ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ— ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”ค
    Order of the Royal Police of Thailand
    ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ 330/2550
    No. 330/2550
    ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ— ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะŸั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฎ ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฎ
    Subject: Specified methods in conducting lรจse majeste cases and [procedures used by] committees considering lese majeste cases
    ********************
    ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ 28/2548 ั€โ••ะตั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ 17 ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฑ 2548 ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะตั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะฅั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘
    In accordance with Royal Thai Police order no. 28/2548 issued 17 July 2005, regarding change of order in setting up committees
    ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฎ ั€โ••ะ›ั€โ••โ•ขั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะŸั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ’ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะ‘
    to consider lese majeste cases, which prescribed procedures for inquiry officials and all authorities
    ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฆั€โ••โ•–ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะŸั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะนั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฎ ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฉ
    given to abide by when encountering instances of committing an offense having the appearance of lese majeste,
    ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”ค ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฎั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—
    the Royal Thai Police have considered and found that consideration of proceedings related to lese majeste is an important
    ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฅั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะค ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะช ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ•–ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะตั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะง ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ•ขั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะณ
    matter, [it] being necessary to examine in detail, thoroughly, so as not be an irritation to their Majesties. Thus it is appropriate
    ั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะŸั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฎ ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะธั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ˜
    to improve methods concerning proceeding with the case, and the lese majeste investigation committee, by virtue of authority contained in
    ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะšั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”ค ั€โ••ะฎ.ั€โ••ะธ.2547 ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ 11(4) ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ•ขั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ 28/2548
    Royal Thai Police Act of 2004 Section 11 (4) that cancelled Royal Thai Police order no. 28/2548 issued on
    ั€โ••ะตั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ 17 ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฑ 2548 ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะŸั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ’ั€โ••โ•ขั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะ˜ ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ™
    17 January 2005 and which prescribed new methods [to be used] as follows:
    1.ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะต ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ••ะจั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ” 1-9 ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ— ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    1. The Metropolitan Police Bureau of Royal Thai Police and provincial police regions 1-9, [and] the Central Investigation Bureau and the
    ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะต ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฎ ั€โ••ะ’ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ/ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ••ะจั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ” ั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะช
    Public Security Police shall have an investigation board belonging to police headquarters and provincial police composed of:
    ั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฒ
    1.1 ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะจั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    1.1 Commissioner as board chair
    1.2 ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฉ ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    1.2 All deputy commissioners as board members
    1.3 ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะงั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ••/ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะšั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะช ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    1.3 Local commanders where incident took place/with responsibility, as board members
    1.4 ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะงั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ••/ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะšั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะช ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    1.4 Local superintendents where incident took place/with responsibility, as board members
    1.5 ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ/ ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะตั€โ••ะ’ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    1.5 General Staff Division commander, as board member/secretary
    ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะจั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะฅั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะšั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะณ
    In this the said board chair shall have authority to appoint additional branch police staff to be board members as deemed appropriate.
    2.ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะžั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะงั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะชั€โ•ฃะ”ั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ˜
    2. At the time when units of the Royal Thai Police have been informed, no matter in what manner, that an act has been committed that may fall within the scope of being
    ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะค ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะตั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะžั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะั€โ••โ–“ ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ 112 ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ™
    an offense according to Criminal Code Article 112, the following procedures shall be used:
    2.1 ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะงั€โ••ะนั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะค ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ”ั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜
    2.1 When an accuser consents to proceed with a case against the offender, investigation officials shall proceed in accordance with authority and duties
    ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ”ั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะžั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ— ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะงั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะฒั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—
    in accordance with related law and regulations, and shall report the facts in detail and evidence and testimony to
    ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—
    headquarters to introduce them for consideration to the committee in:
    2.1.1 ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะปั€โ••โ–“
    2.1.1 forming charges
    2.1.2 ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ’ั€โ••ะฝั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะธั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะตั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะช
    2.1.2 requesting the court to issue an arrest warrant
    2.1.3 ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”ค ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•ก
    2.1.3 Preparation of a case opinion to present to the Commissioner of the Royal Thai Police in order to consider ordering charges.
    ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ’ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฒั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฌั€โ••ะตั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ’ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฟ ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะปั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะฒั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘
    During the time [the case is waiting] committee consideration, investigation officers shall investigate evidence and take witness statements
    ั€โ••ะ ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะงั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะงั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•–ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะœั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฅั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ•ฃะ”ั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะšั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฅั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘
    and proceed with various steps in order to know the facts or further prove wrongdoing without delay and not having to wait for opinions from
    ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะฒั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะšั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะœั€โ••ะฅั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“
    the board. When the investigation officers find additional important evidence or witnesses of use to the investigating board
    ั€โ••ะ’ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฅั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะท
    the investigating officials shall quickly submit these to the board.

    ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉ ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะต ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฝ ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”ค ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฒ
    As for the Royal Thai Police office, they shall submit a report to the Royal Thai Police Commissioner for consideration to order
    ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ•ขั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—
    [police officials] that have authority and function for investigation to proceed in accordance with paragraph two.
    2.2 ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะžั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะดั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ•ฃะœั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะตั€โ••ะšั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•–ั€โ••ะฝั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ”ั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะงั€โ••ะน ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะšั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒ
    2.2 When activity occurs from media or in the instance where there are no allegations responsible officials shall report
    ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะงั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜
    facts in detail and submit them to headquarters to introduce for consideration to the committee to consider whether such
    ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะตั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะžั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะั€โ••โ–“ ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ 112 ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•–ั€โ••ะฝั€โ•ฃะ”ั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะ˜ ั€โ••ะปั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฟั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉ
    actions fall within the scope of offense according to Criminal Code 112 or not. If the investigation committee investigates the matter and determines that
    ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะค ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝ 2.1 ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ”ั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••โ–“
    the activity [investigated falls] within the scope to where it is an offense, [officials shall] proceed as per Section 2.1, and if after investigation it is determined that said activity [investigated within the scope of authorities] does not
    ั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะค ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”ค ั€โ••ะงั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะชั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะท
    constitute an offense officials shall notify the Commissioner of the Royal Thai Police with dispatch.
    2.3 ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะตั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะท ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะ›ั€โ••โ•ขั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••โ–“ ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•–ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ•ฃะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะ™
    2.3 When any group or individual is apprehended in proceeding with case cited because the offense was openly committed or other need exists to cause apprehending,
    ั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะ”ั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะžั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”ค ั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะงั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะค
    where no warrant [was issued] as prescribed in decreed statute, after apprehending the [group or individual] investigating officials shall quickly report facts and details
    ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฅั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    together with related documents and evidence, accompanied with an initial opinion and submit [this information] to headquarters to introduce for consideration to the committee
    ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝ 2.1
    to proceed in accordance with Section 2.1.
    3. ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฉ ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ/ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ••ะจั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ” ั€โ•ฃะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉ
    When investigating officials have completed investigation, and headquarters/ provincial police region office
    ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”ค ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะั€โ••โ–“ ั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะตั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะฉ
    have submitted the case file, together with case opinion to the office of Royal Thai Police [Bangkok], the commander of the Criminal Case Bureau shall compile the case and submit it for consideration to the
    ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ”คั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะ’ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”ค ั€โ••ะ›ั€โ••โ•ขั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฒ
    Lese Majeste investigation cases committee of the Royal Thai Police which is comprised of:
    3.1 ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”ค ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะจั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    3.1 Deputy commissioner, Royal Thai Police
    (ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ•–ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะžั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒ) (tasked with investigation and legal affairs)
    3.2 ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะšั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”ค ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    3.2 All assistants to the commissioner of the Royal Thai Police, each a board member
    (ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ•–ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะžั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒ) ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฉ (tasked with investigation and legal affairs)
    3.3 ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะžั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉ ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    3.3 Commissioner of the office of Legal Affairs and Investigations, board member
    3.4 ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะต ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    3.4 Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Bureau, board member
    3.5 ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ— ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    3.5 Commissioner of the Central Investigations Bureau, board member
    3.6 ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ ั€โ••ะงั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ•• ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    3.6 Local commissioner in location of incident, board member
    3.7 ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    3.7 Commander, Bureau of Regulations, board member
    3.8 ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะั€โ••โ–“ ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ/ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะตั€โ••ะ’ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    3.8 Commander, Criminal Case Bureau, board member and secretary
    3.9 ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะั€โ••โ–“ ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะฉ ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะšั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะตั€โ••ะ’ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณ
    3.9 All deputy commanders, Criminal Case Bureau, as assistants to secretary
    ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•ก ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•–ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ•ขั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะช
    in consideration of an opinion to submit [the case] to the Commissioner of the Royal Thai Police for [his] opinion, or to otherwise order [as needed] appropriate to the case.
    ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•ก
    4,ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ••ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฅั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฉ ั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะ’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะงั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะซั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะŸั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะปั€โ••โ–“ ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฅั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะปั€โ••โ–“ ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜
    4. In initial reporting of the case, investigating officials shall summarize facts by indicating the name of the accuser, name of accused, the offense which
    ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะปั€โ••โ–“ ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•–ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะซั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ•• ั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฆั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะคั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ•• ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะดั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ•ฃะœั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–‘ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะค ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฅั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะช
    is being alleged, date and month incident occurred, location incident occurred, and detailed circumstances of the case and submit [said] to commanders following order of rank
    ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฆั€โ••โ•ขั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”ค (ั€โ••ะฌั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฉ ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะคั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฝั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะั€โ••โ–“ ) ั€โ••ะฐั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะฉ 3ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฉ ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะฅั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะตั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะทั€โ•ฃะ’ั€โ••ะงั€โ••ะน
    up to the Commissioner of the Royal Thai Police (through the Criminal Case Bureau) within three days counting from when the accusation is received.
    5.ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะปั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ”ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ•ฃะ“ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฝั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•–ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉ โ€œั€โ••ะตั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะชั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘โ€ ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฃั€โ••โ•ก
    5. The level of secrecy in submittal of the matter shall be โ€œTop Secretโ€ in each instance.
    ั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะฅั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะคั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะซั€โ•ฃะ—ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะฅั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะฉั€โ•ฃะ”ั€โ••ะซ
    This shall [be in effect] from this time on.
    ั€โ••ะบั€โ••โ–’ั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ— ั€โ••ะฃ ั€โ••ะทั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••ะงั€โ••โ•กั€โ•ฃะ˜ 4 ั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะฆั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะฉั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฒั€โ••ะฉ 2550
    Ordered 4 June 2007
    ั€โ••ะฎั€โ••ะตั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฝั€โ••ะ‘ ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะธั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะงั€โ••ะจั€โ•ฃะœ ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฅั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฒั€โ••โ–“ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะบ
    Police General Seripisut Temiyavet ( ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะบั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฎั€โ••โ”คั€โ••ะธั€โ••โ••ั€โ••ะงั€โ••ะจั€โ•ฃะœ ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะฅั€โ••ะฑั€โ••โ•กั€โ••ะฒั€โ••โ–“ั€โ•ฃะั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะบ )
    ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••ะนั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะšั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะงั€โ••ะฉ ั€โ••ะฌั€โ••โ•ฃั€โ•ฃะ™ั€โ••ะชั€โ••โ–’ั€โ••ะั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะ‘ั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”‚ั€โ••ะณั€โ••ะทั€โ••ะ˜ั€โ•ฃะ‘ั€โ••ะปั€โ•ฃะ˜ั€โ••ะ—ั€โ••ะšั€โ••โ–“ั€โ••ะฅั€โ••โ”ค
    Acting Commissioner of the Royal Thai Police

  17. Frank G Anderson says:
    18 December 2011 at 10:54 pm
    Thailand’s high calibre Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    Having now read that statement in its fullest detail, I ask whether those in the state, government, private groups and secret “cells” that spread hate speech against those who spoke in a legitimate manner, such as recent anti-US and anti-UN statements and demonstrations about the lese majeste law, are they also going to be held accountable? Is that, in fact, not why the US and UN finally spoke out – t0 to hold the Thai state accountable for its actions or lack thereof? Thailand is a signatory to various UN understakings; it should not cringe from its responsibilities, even when they involve Article 112 and the notorious 2007 Computer Crime Law, when just criticism is leveled against the country. Venting anger and indignation is not the way to needed reform.

  18. Frank G Anderson says:
    18 December 2011 at 10:27 pm
    Thailand’s high calibre Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    When one is infatuated with oneself [and makes a career of ensuring one’s fellows are likewise infatuated] so as to claim perfection on the one hand, and so easily demonstrate unashamed disgust at those who claim otherwise – that is, those with common sense – it is difficult to see where this mild satire might find a nest in the tree. Abandoned religion, abandoned ethics, abandoned logic…what else is there not to abandon except illusion? Who else is there to imprison but those who prove what is not accepted?

  19. Vichai N says:
    18 December 2011 at 9:50 pm
    Another academic victim of 112

    “What do we really know? I think far too little.” – Nostitz

    Well we know enough of Chalerm and Thaksin. Both are self-serving and very manipulative . . . and unashamedly very very corupt; and combative both.

    Both rode and continue to ride the Red coat tails because it suited their self-interests just fine. Now riding the Royal coat tails becomes their new imperative .

    Hallelujah Chalerm and Thaksin (and Yingluck too) have seen the light, and they have been enlightened. And Chalerm will wield and slash with his shining sword all those who continue to disbelieve and disobey, whatever color of coats they wear.

  20. Sabai sabai says:
    18 December 2011 at 9:40 pm
    Thailand’s high calibre Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    Hear hear Somchai!

PREV PAGENEXT