Comments

  1. Louis Chevalier says:

    I have one further thought!
    The population of BKK is c.11.5 million people
    Were you add to that the populations of the S/W/E regions..yes I know population is not the same as eligible voters..the population count would rise to c. 30 million. The population of the N and NE is c.35 million.
    That presents an electoral uphill battle for BKK in spite of its wealth.
    I find it quite amusing that the avaricious drive to grab land in the North, the North East and the South in earlier times has come home to haunt the Thai ‘elite’

  2. Tom says:

    Great work as usual Nick – don’t listen to that jerk

  3. Lisa Gardner says:

    Great work as always Nick. Glad you’re safe and well.

  4. Joe says:

    “Being in opposition is like starving yourself to death.” Banharn Silpa-archa

  5. Sam Deedes says:

    I for one would contribute to a fund for Nick to buy a periscope camera or anything else he needs to keep coming up with these amazing stories.

    Do we know who was in the silver car or why it was attacked? (Sorry if I missed this elsewhere).

  6. Louis Chevalier says:

    The ‘blues’ have made no effort to ‘infiltrate’ let alone persuade voters outside of Bangkok and the South that they have anything to offer them. Even Democrats/Republicans/Tories/Labour in the US/UK make an effort to put up a platform and manifesto. There appears, in ‘yellow..now transformed into tri-color’ camps, to be a wholly unfounded belief that past oligarchies and patronages will secure an ‘authoritarian’ ‘royalist’ and obeisant people in the future. One must wonder why the ‘South’ apparently supports Suthep. OK there were and are unpleasant legacies of Thaksin’s period of office in the deep south. The negligence of past patrimonial regimes in enhancing the lives of those in the so-called periphery is coming home to roost. Never mind the Chiang Mai plutocracy; one day we will get a PM from Roi-Et or Mukdahan!

  7. JC says:

    Nick is there any word as to who was in that car and why they would be so angry with the person? Tweets came out after the incident saying that it was a PDRC supporter dropping bombs out of his window. In the video there seems to be a small dog in the car?

    And any idea who all of those shooters separate from others were. One on a motorcycle, one in a blue jacket next to a telephone booth, and so on. Aside from the two main groups shooting there appeared to be others involved.

  8. Tuptim says:

    Your pictures told a thousand words, those words were very clear. Thank you for your efforts in being there and recording events impartially. I commend you for your bravery.

  9. rod says:

    ” .. One side has the courts on their side and use them as political weapons ..” – Prune

    Baloney! If we take the Rice Pledge Program and the Thai courts, after due deliberations, find PM Yingluck guilty of gross mismanagement and negligence that led to: (a) Thailand’s eminent rice industry nearly gutted; (b) rampant unchecked graft and corruption; (c) staggering billions of bahts of losses thru ruinous market interventions/manipulations; (d) devastating adverse economic harm inflicted to hundreds of thousands of rice farmers livelihoods; etc etc. Would Prune’s Red Shirt bias supplant his/her better judgment, that indeed Yingluck as PM and Chairwoman of the Rice Policy Committee had been grossly and criminally negligent. And thus Yingluck deserves to be impeached from PM’s office; plus a number of Yingluck ministers have to be criminally tried for their active roles in the rampant graft rampant at Yingluck regime’s rice program?

    The Yingluck’s government Rice Program is TOP SECRET, and only heaven (or maybe the devil) knows why? No transparency, no accounting, no audits, no reports …. When economic losses of the Rice Program are being estimated as accounting to as much as 3.5% of GDP, and the ongoing government still refusing TO BE ACCOUNTABLE, is certainly NOT democractic and I suspect, also unconstitutional.

  10. John L says:

    That is (more or less) what he says.

  11. Nick Nostitz says:

    My sincere apologies for having been born as a Kraut an not as a native English speaker.

  12. Nick Nostitz says:

    No I didn’t. It was the protesters at the police block, which, if you read my story, were the Red Shirt/Pro-election protesters. The PDRC protesters were 200 meters away.
    Please pay attention what i write before posting.

  13. Anon says:

    No Pulitzers for this one. Could somebody do some editing for the last sentence of the first paragraph? It’s a sloppy ungrammatical mass that ruins the credibility of the article.

  14. Ralph Kramden says:

    Thanks Nick, another great effort.

  15. HAauman says:

    You got it wrong. The ones beating the car are the pro-governmet Red Shirts led by Ko Tee

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/thailand/10606562/Thai-red-shirts-leader-says-Its-time-to-get-rid-of-the-elite.html

  16. Elvis says:

    ….but…but….Thaksin…Buffalo!…Vote Buying!…but…but…Proxy….The Regime!…

  17. Louis Chevalier says:

    I have been reading and trying to piece together a framework of understanding for what is going on. You may find something cohesive in the following!:
    William J. Gedney the great linguistic scholar who worked primarily on Tai-Kradai languages was of the opinion that there were some 80 functioning languages in Thailand. In the places where I live no-one much speaks standard Thai: In Chiang Mai they speak Phasa Nuea, Lanna, Kam Mueang, or even Thai Yuan, In Issan they speak Lao, Phu Thai and Yor. In Phuket they speak Chaiya dialect..and then there is Chinese!

    One other way of looking at the fragile composition of Thailand is to read Siam Mapped :
    A History of the Geobody of a Nation
    by Thongchai Winickakul
    where he explores how the tenuous entity that is Thailand was created, by maps and force.

    It is hardly any wonder that the ‘centre cannot hold’ : though I doubt the ‘red shirts’ can be described as ‘the rough beast slouching to Bangkok to be born’!

    It might also be helpful if the rigorous system of social control that Thailand operates through the ID card and the ‘Tabian Ban’ might be looked at in the electoral context
    http://thailand.prd.go.th/view_news.php?id=2788&a=2
    The Bangkok vote might look quite different were it not for the Tabian Ban rule!
    If you read on you might begin to think that : maybe some kind of regional policy, federalism, devolution is the way forward. ??

    Anyone with stamina might read on
    FPIF Articles

    Mostly not wonderful. Walden Bello the best
    What Do Thailand, Ukraine, Belgium, and Egypt Have in Common? Dysfunctional Democracies
    When the losing party in an election resorts to extra-legal measures, democracy is threatened and secession may follow.
    By Keith K C Hui,
    Thailand’s Deep Divide
    Thailand’s anti-corruption protesters appear to have lost faith in the key tenet of representative democracy: rule by people or parties elected by the majority of citizens.
    By Walden Bello,
    Thailand’s Protests and the Global Economy
    As the economies of Southeast Asia integrate, Thailand’s social divide is as stark as ever.
    By Layne Hartsell
    Also in Asia Times
    New Mandala much better
    Middle class rage threatens democracy
    BY
    MARC SAXER,
    http://www.newmandala.org/2014/01/21/middle-class-rage-threatens-democracy/
    Thailand’s 3D Conflict
    BY VEERAYOOTH KANCHOOCHAT
    http://www.newmandala.org/2014/02/06/thailands-3d-conflict/
    Thailand’s ‘Days of our Strife’
    JOHN BLAXLAND
    http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/news-events/all-stories/thailands-days-our-strife#.UvRi9mKSznh
    Thailand’s electorate deserves respect
    BY
    ANDREW WALKER
    http://www.newmandala.org/2014/01/31/thailands-electorate-deserves-respect/
    Probably the best book on Bangkok is
    Bangkok: Place, Practice and Representation (Asia’s Transformations/Asia’s Great Cities)
    By
    MARC ASKEW

    I have been struck, intermittently by some of the following:
    Proxy Government.
    Well there are and have been plenty of proxy governments, particularly those operating in monarchies.
    Elites, Establishment,..
    While the notion of establishments, whether or not synonymous with a ‘ruling class’ if rooted in some historical contexts is easy to grasp I have yet to encounter any accurate description or representation of Thailand’s Elites. If one followed C.Wright Mills it would include individuals with power ascribed to :

    Age. Leaders average about 60 years of age. The heads of foundations, law, education, and civic organizations average around 62 years of age. Government-sector members about 56 years old
    Gender..Mostly men?
    Ethnicity . An interesting concept in Thailand given the wide variety, power and dispersion of ‘ethnic’ groups.
    Education
    Nearly all leaders are college-educated . In the US almost half having advanced degrees and about 54 percent of the big-business leaders and 42 percent of the government elite are graduates of just 12 heavily endowed, prestigious universities. The composition of bodies like the Election Commission and the National Anti Corruption Commission?
    Social Clubs: Golf? Etc!
    Here you would clearly add the Police and the Military
    So that is hardly going to be a description of ‘rural’ Thailand
    Bukharin would have liked Thailand. I think he said:” state power is nothing but an entrepreneurs’ company of tremendous power” which would happily feed those who believe in a kleptocracy!

    Democracy and Buddhism
    Are they compatible?? I would like to know. Do ideas and ideologies of the moral self and immoral individuals rather than those which propose systems and institutions of transparent propriety have greater weight here? Is there a belief that populism is immoral, and thus far powerless, in conflict with a notion that benign oligarchic and patrimonial neglect is moral?
    Thence may derive the expression of a desire for the institutionalisation of conflict resolutions systems rather than an ad hominem approach?

    Middle classes.
    Marc Saxer makes it clear he is really talking about the Bangkok middle class..see Askew, too-but as others have pointed out there is not only a middle class in
    Possibly every Jangwat, but a meritocratic and plutocratic middle class.
    However the notion of a ‘Moral Geography’ which has been scoffed at by some as being a smoke screen for a ‘Power Geography’ has some merit if you believe that the moral/Thai ethnic centre of Thailand is Bangkok while the outlying provinces harbour non-Thais innumerable.

  18. Ralph Kramden says:

    When “Peter Cohen” is in your corner, citing LKY, you know you are in a very particular corner.

  19. neptunian says:

    So, I guess your are all for military dictatorship? Finding the so called “good people” in the Democrat camp has an even slimmer chance than SETI.

  20. Sven says:

    Where is the “thumbs down” for articles when you need it?
    He does make some valid points, but in general this sounds like a toned down version of an article that could be published without problems in “The Nation”.
    For once I will only point to the fact, that the “war on drugs” (or “war against crime” as the author calls it), wasn’t really Thaksin’s idea, it started in December 2002 with a certain birthday speech (and Thaksin’s approach was supported one year later at the 2003 speech).
    Most other points can put into perspective by reading the “A response to Vanina Sucharitkul” article (better the slightly more detailed Facebook version) on this side.