Comments

  1. Wichien Choosamer says:

    Hi Patrick
    Thanks a lot for your reviews,it seems to inform new facts for me,and h r u and ur family,I had retired for 3 years from WU.Love to read more from yours.
    Wichien Choosamer,Nakhon Si Thammarat
    (http://www.thaidhamma.net)(http://www.dhamma.org/) Ohh! this site may inform a bit more to you.

  2. Kaen Phet says:

    Just one more comment addressing the issue of ‘defending the monarchy’ – hypothetical of course as the day has long passed. One may consider the following: Had HM the King really been as far-sighted and sagacious as advertised why didn’t he consider installing the heir apparent to the throne around his 80th birthday, or even a little earlier, with the idea of providing some additional insurance for the future of the dynasty? Being fully cognizant of the rather mediocre nature of candidate in waiting, not to mention his singular lack of popular appeal had he been installed some time ago and ‘bedded in’ (no smirking please), as it were, the problematic nature of the succession would, perhaps, have been much reduced. Then again whether this would have been feasible or possible under the ‘monthian baan’ palace law is something I simply do not know.

  3. Angry Grey Man says:

    I apologise for the outburst, and for the attack on the author.

    It’s just I’ve seen Prof. Reuban’s material on this site before, where he says pretty much the same thing. Is this not a predictable position for a lawyer to take? The people don’t understand the legal system. Oh! How convenient.

    http://www.newmandala.org/2013/08/19/the-role-of-public-interest-litigation-in-the-quest-for-democracy-in-malaysia/

    http://www.newmandala.org/2012/10/23/hobbism-and-malaysia/

    There is just so much Malaysia material here that takes the same line.

    Why not a positive Malaysia post for a change?

    What’s wrong with Malaysia?

    Everyone has their solution to their Malaysia problem but none of it seems to involve a new perspective.

  4. Gregore Lopez says:

    Oucchhh! That hurts.

  5. Daniel says:

    This is a completely reasonable comment.

    (Like the post above, see how hard it is to tell whether or not I’m being sarcastic or I’m actually that obnoxious?)

  6. nontok says:

    The statue and its surrounds has become a popular and interesting site:

    http://siameserose.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/triumph-of-the-titan-anuwong/#more-228

    What was this riverfront area like in the late seventies and eighties? Did people always congregate and socialise there? What other images are for sale at other sites in Vientiane?

  7. Kaen Phet says:

    Charles Kinbote

    What is your honest opinion about the fellow who will, in all likelihood, step into his father’s shoes some time in the not too distant future? Do you regard him as a paragon of virtue, do you ‘love’ him, would you die for him? Can he be compared favourably with God and Enstein as was the case with the present incumbent during the celebrations for his 60th year on the throne (I happened to see this extraordinary comparison – in English – when boarding a plane at Suwwanaphum airport in 2006)? And finally, have you ever met another Thai person who offered fulsome, unstinting praise for the heir? Be honest in your response sir. Of course people are worried about the succession. The incumbent’s shoes simply cannot be filled. It’s a bit like going to a concert to see a genuine superstar who is then followed on stage by the warm up act to wrap up the show. What a bummer!

  8. Angry Grey Man says:

    I don’t read New Mandala to read plugs. Boring. Why is this on here? Who cares! You’re promoting a site that contains the same old, repeated ad-nauseum, questions as the content on Malaysia found here? If this Rueban Balasubramaniam wants to contribute to the debate for his name to be known, why doesn’t he contribute to the posts made on the same topics, here?

    You’ve taken up the prime weekend position with this post. Why? Is this the same sort of patronage-seeking behaviour found in Malaysian politics, but occuring on New Mandala between academics of different ranks?

  9. charles kinbote says:

    There is no need to dissolve the Monarchy here, it is a stupid idea, Thai people are not ready for the megalomaniac Thaksin’s Republic.
    The King has already said he wishes to be rid of les majeste.
    So why not,well Thaksin wants a controlled environment when he comes back, and the ability to piggy back lese majeste Thaksin Yingluck. That is National Security used as a weapon
    What people are worried about here is the succession, not les majeste,the people are used to Monarchy, they trust it and they see utter corruption here in politic. Both sides.
    The people have opinion but no say in the succession

  10. It’s the place mat from a meal I had in Pizza Hut Chiang Mai about 10 years ago. AW

  11. Jughead says:

    Press Briefing of the 3rd Parliamentary Delegation to the Laos on the enforced disappearance of Sombath Somphone

    Foreign Correspondents Club Thailand

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ops9Uew5mXY

  12. Veronica says:

    “European Parliamentarians Accuse Lao Government of Lying Over Sombath’s Case”

    http://www.rfa.org/english/news/laos/sombath-08292013024733.html

    European parliamentarians have accused the Lao government of deceiving and lying to the international community about the mysterious disappearance of respected local civil society leader Sombath Somphone….

  13. Bettie says:

    “Laos accused of lying over Sombath Somphone abduction”

    By Jonah Fisher

    BBC News, Bangkok

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-23862691

  14. Arthurson says:

    Yeah, but it’s worth commenting that Pizza Company ripped off the Pizza Hut business model and logo, simply because they could get away with it with impunity in Thailand. In any Western country they would have been sued out of existence for traderight infringement.

  15. Arthurson says:

    I second everything you said! Ironically, I too am a fan of Somtow’s sci-fi, and have been since the 1970s. Some of the things he wrote and said in 2010, however, clearly label him as grossly out of touch with the common man and woman in Thailand. Too much Mahler, perhaps?

  16. Moe Aung says:

    Yeah,love that picture.

  17. Daniel says:

    I’m sorry – I posted hastily and thought you were referring to The King Never Smiles. I have no idea if the King and I is still banned.

  18. Daniel says:

    Yes, it is still banned.

    Is this comment related to my post specifically?

  19. John G. says:

    On a smaller note, is there a credit for the picture?

  20. Moe Aung says:

    Is The King And I still banned?