Thats right, bow before your overlord Woody and accept the fact that your children , and their children and their children’s children’s children will bow to the feet and nibble the dog cupcakes of the offspring of the current members of the Chankri dynasty and their children and their childrens’ childrent ………….. forever……………..
Excellent report once again. Thank you, Nick. It’s amazing that the MSM ignore events like these. Without your reports there would be huge gaps in the historical record of this era.
I was more focused on the cupcake that woody seems to like so much, it brought him to tears for half an hour. Hmm… that must have been one REALLY delicious cupcake.
Ken. You are fibbing. You didn’t read the thread at all. If you had, you would know that the question you raise was dealt with above in discussions of acts and academic papers.
What can you say when you live in a country that has no freedom in speech, no democracy and no freedom of expression? I wonder what will happen if Article 112 is eliminated? If all those responses were done freely without any repression or without any propaganda, I am sure the result would be completely different.
Yes, this morning (April 8, 2011) NBT-TV Morning Focus reported that Defence Minister General Prayuth was quoted as saying Thailand “never used, never possessed” cluster bombs. This was followed by some double speak that the Thai Ambassador to the UN in Geneva was misquoted by the Cluster Munitions Coalition, and that the 155mm Dual Purpose Improved Conventional Munitions used were not cluster munitions.
Apparently saying it ain’t so makes everything all right, despite all the evidence to the contrary lying on the ground in Preah Vihar province, Cambodia.
They did admit in the same broadcast that Thailand was a signatory to the 1997 Land Mine Treaty. Presumably this means that Thailand had some obligation not to have deployed anti-personnel, unexploded ordnance (UXO) known to maim and kill civilians in their retaliatory attacks on Cambodia.
Ken: Some trees need be pruned, to allow the rest of the tree to flourish.
(another analogy is that an over protective father can stifle childrens growth and development – it can happen even in the most caring family, or in a military family)
“The monarch’s advice would be considered in any future plans.” That sounds like the next best thing to insubordination. Or is it a healthy sign that Thailand is a mature democracy? In the distant days when I was a bureaucrat we had a standard response to letters from the public: “Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts with us, and rest assured that we will waste no time studying your suggestions.”
Ken- “CPB is not owned by any particular person, not King Rama IX. It is an asset of the crown, anyone who become the head of state have some rights to control and use the money. ”
In the bold, that is where you are wrong. Read the crown property act and see how it was modified in 1948. Factually, describing what is, you’re right, it is just undemocratic and historically wrong.
In the end, it is wealth own by the people, by the country and by law we let the head of state use and control it to some extent. The law and constitution can be changed through democratic legislation process. Over times, if there is a public agreement to change this law, it will.
This is also only partially true. The crown property act (and also the lese majeste), was changed during military dictatorships. (crown property act in 1948 and lese majeste after 1976)
A Thai response to Princess Chulabhorn’s interview
Thats right, bow before your overlord Woody and accept the fact that your children , and their children and their children’s children’s children will bow to the feet and nibble the dog cupcakes of the offspring of the current members of the Chankri dynasty and their children and their childrens’ childrent ………….. forever……………..
if they have their way………………………….
Oh what a grand future that will be……………………..
NOT.
Thai ambassador to speak at ANU
Doe anyonw know if there be a question and answer session as part of this event?
A mass rally and a funeral
@ Micheal- I think that is exactly the point.
“He who controls the present controls the past. He who controls the past controls the future.”
Thailand accused of using cluster bombs against Cambodia
[…] http://www.newmandala.org/2011/04/06/thailand-accused-of-using-cluster-bombs-against-… […]
Thailand accused of using cluster bombs against Cambodia
[…] April 6th, 2011 by Andrew Walker ┬╖ 20 Comments […]
Thailand accused of using cluster bombs against Cambodia
[…] April 6th, 2011 by Andrew Walker ┬╖ 20 Comments […]
Thai ambassador to speak at ANU
Pantip Plaza?
Thai ambassador to speak at ANU
Anyone prepared to predict how far he will be prepared to deviate from his topic?
A mass rally and a funeral
Excellent report once again. Thank you, Nick. It’s amazing that the MSM ignore events like these. Without your reports there would be huge gaps in the historical record of this era.
Popular responses to Princess Chulabhorn’s interview
So many irony in so many level, even the most die-hard royalist found this to be a bit over dramatic.
Popular responses to Princess Chulabhorn’s interview
Another ‘Taa Sawaang’ show? The events are moving forward here nicely. My compliments to the chef of that delicious cupcake for the poodle.
A Thai response to Princess Chulabhorn’s interview
I was more focused on the cupcake that woody seems to like so much, it brought him to tears for half an hour. Hmm… that must have been one REALLY delicious cupcake.
A Thai response to Princess Chulabhorn’s interview
“her views about doomsday.”
Sounds a bit “fin de siecle”…. can anyone expand on it?
“Qu’ils mangent de la brioche.”
Popular responses to Princess Chulabhorn’s interview
Woody losing more than just a little weight… speculation??
Thailand’s royal billions
Ken. You are fibbing. You didn’t read the thread at all. If you had, you would know that the question you raise was dealt with above in discussions of acts and academic papers.
Popular responses to Princess Chulabhorn’s interview
What can you say when you live in a country that has no freedom in speech, no democracy and no freedom of expression? I wonder what will happen if Article 112 is eliminated? If all those responses were done freely without any repression or without any propaganda, I am sure the result would be completely different.
Thailand accused of using cluster bombs against Cambodia
@ BKKlawyer – 18
Yes, this morning (April 8, 2011) NBT-TV Morning Focus reported that Defence Minister General Prayuth was quoted as saying Thailand “never used, never possessed” cluster bombs. This was followed by some double speak that the Thai Ambassador to the UN in Geneva was misquoted by the Cluster Munitions Coalition, and that the 155mm Dual Purpose Improved Conventional Munitions used were not cluster munitions.
Apparently saying it ain’t so makes everything all right, despite all the evidence to the contrary lying on the ground in Preah Vihar province, Cambodia.
They did admit in the same broadcast that Thailand was a signatory to the 1997 Land Mine Treaty. Presumably this means that Thailand had some obligation not to have deployed anti-personnel, unexploded ordnance (UXO) known to maim and kill civilians in their retaliatory attacks on Cambodia.
Thailand’s royal billions
Ken: Some trees need be pruned, to allow the rest of the tree to flourish.
(another analogy is that an over protective father can stifle childrens growth and development – it can happen even in the most caring family, or in a military family)
On Thailand’s submarine ambitions
“The monarch’s advice would be considered in any future plans.” That sounds like the next best thing to insubordination. Or is it a healthy sign that Thailand is a mature democracy? In the distant days when I was a bureaucrat we had a standard response to letters from the public: “Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts with us, and rest assured that we will waste no time studying your suggestions.”
Thailand’s royal billions
Ken- “CPB is not owned by any particular person, not King Rama IX. It is an asset of the crown, anyone who become the head of state have some rights to control and use the money. ”
In the bold, that is where you are wrong. Read the crown property act and see how it was modified in 1948. Factually, describing what is, you’re right, it is just undemocratic and historically wrong.
In the end, it is wealth own by the people, by the country and by law we let the head of state use and control it to some extent. The law and constitution can be changed through democratic legislation process. Over times, if there is a public agreement to change this law, it will.
This is also only partially true. The crown property act (and also the lese majeste), was changed during military dictatorships. (crown property act in 1948 and lese majeste after 1976)